Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 bump aws sdk version #4916

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 19, 2024

Conversation

stefanmcshane
Copy link
Contributor

@stefanmcshane stefanmcshane commented Apr 9, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Requested change to reduce the size of #4906

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • includes emojis
  • adds unit tests
  • adds or updates e2e tests

Release note:

 Bump aws-sdk-go to v1.51

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-priority labels Apr 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @stefanmcshane. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@stefanmcshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign AndiDog

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Apr 9, 2024
@stefanmcshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

make verify-modules works locally without error

@stefanmcshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@AndiDog
Copy link
Contributor

AndiDog commented Apr 10, 2024

failed: No matching PR type indicator found in title. – please go through the checklist in the PR template

@AndiDog
Copy link
Contributor

AndiDog commented Apr 10, 2024

apidiff differences look fine since only new SDK function signatures were added, AFAICS. Only the the PR formalities must be fixed, I think.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 10, 2024
@stefanmcshane stefanmcshane changed the title bump aws sdk version 🌱 bump aws sdk version Apr 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 10, 2024
@stefanmcshane
Copy link
Contributor Author

Made all the necessary changes @AndiDog. Let me know if you need anything else 😄

@AndiDog
Copy link
Contributor

AndiDog commented Apr 15, 2024

The commit contains lots of unrelated changes. Probably a rebase mistake?

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Apr 18, 2024

Thank you for this PR @stefanmcshane
Could you please rebase your PR against main?
TY

@AndiDog
Copy link
Contributor

AndiDog commented Apr 18, 2024

/lgtm

but must be rebased

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 18, 2024
@richardcase
Copy link
Member

I'd love to get this in and backported:

/cherrypick release-2.4

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@richardcase: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-2.4 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

I'd love to get this in and backported:

/cherrypick release-2.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

@stefanmcshane - would you be able to rebase this and then i will approve.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 18, 2024
@richardcase
Copy link
Member

Thanks @stefanmcshane.

/test ?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@richardcase: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-blocking
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-clusterclass
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-conformance-with-ci-artifacts
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-gc
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks-testing

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-apidiff-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-build-docker
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-test
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-verify

In response to this:

Thanks @stefanmcshane.

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

Just in case:

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks

@richardcase
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

Until the e2e passes:

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 18, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 18, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: richardcase

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 18, 2024
@richardcase
Copy link
Member

The e2e passed so:

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 19, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f8ac757 into kubernetes-sigs:main Apr 19, 2024
21 checks passed
@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@richardcase: #4916 failed to apply on top of branch "release-2.4":

Applying: bump aws version
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	go.mod
M	go.sum
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging go.sum
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in go.sum
Auto-merging go.mod
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 bump aws version
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

I'd love to get this in and backported:

/cherrypick release-2.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@richardcase richardcase mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants